Help with MCP at scale.

Why this is trickier than it looks

MCP is no longer emerging — it is infrastructure. 97 million monthly SDK downloads, 10,000+ public servers, and first-party support from every major cloud provider. The protocol surface is now a production concern: Streamable HTTP, authorization, registries, load-balanced sessions, and enterprise audit expectations.

When an enterprise adopts MCP seriously, the pain moves up the stack: tool-catalog bloat (hundreds of tools in a single session), context compression at scale, auth federation across servers, schema drift, unstructured errors, observability gaps, and side effects that no one recorded. I've already worked through those trade-offs in a repository that exposes 877 callable tools across 28 Gana meta-tools, handshakes in under a second, and passes 8,000+ tests — including 28 PRAT Gana meta-tools for intelligent compression and routing.

How I work with teams

Three common shapes, pick whatever matches your situation:

• Time-and-materials — Senior MCP expertise, part-time, on your existing backlog. For teams who need capacity without full-time cost.
• Fixed-scope sprint — For a defined deliverable — a production MCP server, a gateway migration, a governance retrofit. 2–6 week window.
• Retainer — For ongoing architecture review, escalation support, and PR review. Best once a relationship is established.

Before we talk

If you're in the very early stages — still deciding if MCP is the right protocol at all — I'm happy to have that conversation, but know that my honest answer is sometimes "not yet." I'm not interested in building infrastructure you'll regret. If your team already has working agents and you're feeling the limits, we have a lot to talk about.